The Auto-Sleeper Motorhome Owners Forum (ASOF)
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Rear door restrictors

+31
kts68
Heanorboy
Lantern
kaspian
PLOUGHLIN
Relaxez-Vous
Sally
Kdc
Toffee
rgermain
Peter Brown
Sagabike
Rolyan
Gromit
MelB
Dbvwt
Snowwolf
Paulmold
Bulletguy
Smithee
Milvus
jennyandpeter
postman
Kingham
GP1069
Spospe
babian
Tinwheeler
RogerThat
Kemerton-bath
C.L.S
35 posters

Page 3 of 5 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Kemerton-bath Fri Jul 26, 2019 10:16 am

I agree Ian but I did feel that CLS was getting deluged with some over-enthusiastic comments.  He’ll have more than enough advice by now.  I’m sure we all wish him well in getting it resolved.

Tim

_________________
Previously symbol-bath

1996 - Autosleeper Symphony   2010 - Autosleeper Symbol    2018 - Autosleeper Kemerton   2023 - Autosleeper Kemerton XL (Fiat)
Kemerton-bath
Kemerton-bath
Donator
Donator

Male

Posts : 1169
Joined : 2013-01-06
Member Age : 65
Location : Bath
Auto-Sleeper Model : Kemerton XL (Fiat)
Vehicle Year : 2020

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Rolyan Sat Jul 27, 2019 5:30 pm

babian wrote:ISO9001 ISO9002 ( google it if you are unaware of what it means) 
in this matter Peugeot have no responsibility in this matter.
U.K. spec van purchased by a/s or imported then production line workers notice missing parts etc, line manager informed, rectification  
work undertaken !!! a cover up as they say ( rear door cards)
 or A/s convert vans then make up spec as the line progresses.???
new owner informed that they are purchasing " the new improved model".
make your own minds up.
always try to do your homework before buying a campervan, know what you are looking at, look at other vans before hand and take on board " common sense " , then ask the questions before you drive off " living the dream", 
no disrespect intended to anyone involved in this matter.
I’m really not sure why you think ISO 9001 negates anyone’s responsibility in this.  Firstly, we simply do not know the cause, or even if there is a ‘fault’. We also don’t know where the ‘fault’ happened (if there is one). But assuming that there is something wrong, ISO 9001 won’t help anyone avoid their legal responsibility.
Rolyan
Rolyan
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 112
Joined : 2018-01-22
Location : West Yorkshire
Auto-Sleeper Model : Sussex Duo
Vehicle Year : 2011

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by babian Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:45 am

ISO9001 is a companies set of objections and working practises . as in manufacturing , an item or service is made or operated and there is a set procedures for quality, specification and if a problem does arise ( in spec or quality) then there is also a set line of reporting, rectification within the production staff, supervisors and management .
this allows a company to show it has procedures in place to record quality, traceability ,uniformity  and finally a products specification in the market place.
ie, in A/S case one van is just the same as the next in spec and quality and as such if you need spares in the future, that spare is correct, fits and is the same as the reference part number.

as the above comments I wish him well in this matter
babian
babian
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 1086
Joined : 2019-05-11
Location : Northamptonshire
Auto-Sleeper Model : Warwick xl
Vehicle Year : 2014

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Rolyan Sun Jul 28, 2019 9:46 am

babian wrote:ISO9001 is a companies set of objections and working practises . as in manufacturing , an item or service is made or operated and there is a set procedures for quality, specification and if a problem does arise ( in spec or quality) then there is also a set line of reporting, rectification within the production staff, supervisors and management .
this allows a company to show it has procedures in place to record quality, traceability ,uniformity  and finally a products specification in the market place.
ie, in A/S case one van is just the same as the next in spec and quality and as such if you need spares in the future, that spare is correct, fits and is the same as the reference part number.

as the above comments I wish him well in this matter
Trust me, as a Senior Executive running the Quality function over a group of companies, responsible for managing and auditing ISO9001 (as well as many other standards, including those for automotive and aerospace), I know exactly what is covered. This is backed up by my position on various BSI committees preparing and issuing standards. My point remains that it does not affect someone’s legal responsibility.

However, the main issue here is that no one knows what has happened, where, when, why and how.  But yes, we all hope that this is resolved quickly and easily; this would be extremely upsetting for any new owner.
Rolyan
Rolyan
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 112
Joined : 2018-01-22
Location : West Yorkshire
Auto-Sleeper Model : Sussex Duo
Vehicle Year : 2011

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by babian Sun Jul 28, 2019 2:05 pm

hi Rolyan,
my intention was not to point a finger at who's  "legal responsibility" it was in this case.
just to point out that a production facility has to have in place production standards, set objectives,  also  practises to work to and a line of feedback off the shop floor "if" something was " missing" or not as standard spec ( as in this case a van )
but yes I agree this matter should be easily resolved once a report is  
submitted 
ian
babian
babian
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 1086
Joined : 2019-05-11
Location : Northamptonshire
Auto-Sleeper Model : Warwick xl
Vehicle Year : 2014

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Rolyan Sun Jul 28, 2019 5:02 pm

babian wrote:hi Rolyan,
my intention was not to point a finger at who's  "legal responsibility" it was in this case.
just to point out that a production facility has to have in place production standards, set objectives,  also  practises to work to and a line of feedback off the shop floor "if" something was " missing" or not as standard spec ( as in this case a van )
but yes I agree this matter should be easily resolved once a report is  
submitted 
ian
Hi Ian - I read your first 2 lines of your original post as referring to ISO9001 then saying that Peugeot have no responsibility in this matter. I may well have interpreted it incorrectly. 

I’m just disappointed that it’s taken so long to resolve this. Not surprised though unfortunately.
Rolyan
Rolyan
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 112
Joined : 2018-01-22
Location : West Yorkshire
Auto-Sleeper Model : Sussex Duo
Vehicle Year : 2011

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Bulletguy Mon Jul 29, 2019 12:22 pm

Rolyan wrote:
babian wrote:hi Rolyan,
my intention was not to point a finger at who's  "legal responsibility" it was in this case.
just to point out that a production facility has to have in place production standards, set objectives,  also  practises to work to and a line of feedback off the shop floor "if" something was " missing" or not as standard spec ( as in this case a van )
but yes I agree this matter should be easily resolved once a report is  
submitted 
ian
Hi Ian - I read your first 2 lines of your original post as referring to ISO9001 then saying that Peugeot have no responsibility in this matter. I may well have interpreted it incorrectly. 

I’m just disappointed that it’s taken so long to resolve this. Not surprised though unfortunately.
Disappointing for sure. Lets hope CLS comes back to update us all on this debacle.
Bulletguy
Bulletguy
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 1058
Joined : 2011-05-06
Location : Cheshire/North Staffs
Auto-Sleeper Model : Vanless

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Sagabike Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:28 pm

My experience of ISO9001, when I was working, was that you set out your quality objectives and procedures to meet them.
In effect within ISO9001 you could set out to produce an item that was defective 100% of the time. Provided you consistently produced 100% defective items then you had met your ISO9001 quality standard.
Hardly a true quality standard!!!
Sagabike
Sagabike
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 52
Joined : 2017-12-11
Location : Swindon Village, Gloucestershi
Auto-Sleeper Model : Warwick
Vehicle Year : 2008

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Peter Brown Mon Jul 29, 2019 11:15 pm

Sagabike wrote:My experience of ISO9001, when I was working, was that you set out your quality objectives and procedures to meet them.
In effect within ISO9001 you could set out to produce an item that was defective 100% of the time. Provided you consistently produced 100% defective items then you had met your ISO9001 quality standard.
Hardly a true quality standard!!!

Spot on
Peter Brown
Peter Brown
Donator
Donator

Male

Posts : 10592
Joined : 2012-11-10
Member Age : 72
Location : Staffs
Auto-Sleeper Model : Broadway EB
Vehicle Year : 2016

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by C.L.S Thu Aug 01, 2019 8:20 pm

So just an update on the missing door restrictors
It was Peugeout that removed these and not Auto sleepers , with no option available from Peugeot to add them to the factory order. All builds from mid July onwards will be have restrictors fitted as Peugeot have reinstated the fitting of these.
As regards my own situation I should be able to retro fit the Peugeot restrictors.
C.L.S
C.L.S
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 40
Joined : 2019-06-30
Location : Midlands
Auto-Sleeper Model : Warwick xl
Vehicle Year : 2019

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Bulletguy Thu Aug 01, 2019 11:16 pm

C.L.S wrote:So just an update on the missing door restrictors
It was Peugeout  that removed these and not Auto sleepers , with no option available from Peugeot to add them to the factory order. All builds from mid July onwards will have restrictors fitted as Peugeot have reinstated the fitting of these.
As regards my own situation I should be able to retro fit the Peugeot  restrictors.
Was there any explanation as to why they removed them? Did they state those vans which had them removed, how they stopped the rear door crunching the light cluster? I'm curious also as to why they've reinstated the fitting of them even though the reason seems pretty obvious! Perhaps a better question would be, why the hell did they remove them in the first place?!! 

So are you being told if you want restrictors, you can have them, but got to pay for them?
Bulletguy
Bulletguy
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 1058
Joined : 2011-05-06
Location : Cheshire/North Staffs
Auto-Sleeper Model : Vanless

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Spospe Fri Aug 02, 2019 10:40 am

I would have thought (hoped) that AS would have queried the removal of the restrictors (door stays) with Peugeot before any conversions were sold; but apparently not.
Spospe
Spospe
Donator
Donator

Male

Posts : 1764
Joined : 2013-11-17
Member Age : 80
Location : South Manchester
Auto-Sleeper Model : Warwick Duo
Vehicle Year : 2014

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Bulletguy Fri Aug 02, 2019 1:26 pm

Spospe wrote:I would have thought (hoped) that AS would have queried the removal of the restrictors (door stays) with Peugeot before any conversions were sold; but apparently not.
They probably wouldn't have known....until the first customer returns with crunched light cluster on his recently purchased £56k van. There's more questions than answers in my opinion and can't help but wonder if it was part of a ridiculous experimental cost cutting exercise. Perhaps they thought buyers shouldn't moan and use a piece of old rope to make their own "restrictor".
Bulletguy
Bulletguy
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 1058
Joined : 2011-05-06
Location : Cheshire/North Staffs
Auto-Sleeper Model : Vanless

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by rgermain Fri Aug 02, 2019 1:50 pm

Auto-Sleepers Motorhomes of Excellence confused3 Still advertising as such.

What would Mark think?
----------
Richard
rgermain
rgermain
Donator
Donator

Male

Posts : 3635
Joined : 2013-11-21
Member Age : 77
Location : Havant
Auto-Sleeper Model : Warwick duo
Vehicle Year : 2015

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Toffee Fri Aug 02, 2019 4:54 pm

Where are all the other owners with the door stops missing?? My first thought was what a load of bull
avatar
Toffee
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 698
Joined : 2016-07-05
Member Age : 57
Location : Staffordshire
Auto-Sleeper Model : Fairford
Vehicle Year : 2016

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Paulmold Fri Aug 02, 2019 5:07 pm

If you read back through the thread both Snowwolf and GP1069 have no restrictors on their vans.

_________________
Nice to be important but more important to be nice
Paulmold
Paulmold
Donator
Donator

Male

Posts : 26585
Joined : 2011-02-21
Member Age : 73
Location : North East Wales
Auto-Sleeper Model : Sussex Duo
Vehicle Year : 2010

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Bulletguy Fri Aug 02, 2019 9:36 pm

Paulmold wrote:If you read back through the thread both Snowwolf and GP1069 have no restrictors on their vans.
And GP1069 had to pay out for his door restrictors ('stops' in his case) and he said they are only effective if the door is opened slowly but a gust of wind would easily smash the door back breaking the window.

What staggers me Paul is in both cases we are talking newly purchased vans and as we know these are not cheap by any means, yet buyers are needing to spend money buying parts which imo should have been factory fitted. This lax attitude toward customers seems commonplace in Britain. 

Some Brit customers don't stand for any messing though! 

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Bulletguy
Bulletguy
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 1058
Joined : 2011-05-06
Location : Cheshire/North Staffs
Auto-Sleeper Model : Vanless

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Kdc Sat Aug 03, 2019 11:03 am

M
rgermain wrote:Auto-Sleepers Motorhomes of Excellence confused3 Still advertising as such.

What would Mark think?
----------
Richard
There may be an answer to that.......he has gone else where!
Kdc
Kdc
Donator
Donator

Male

Posts : 814
Joined : 2018-12-17
Location : Fareham
Auto-Sleeper Model : Warwick xl
Vehicle Year : 2019

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Sally Sat Aug 03, 2019 12:29 pm

Kdc wrote:M
rgermain wrote:Auto-Sleepers Motorhomes of Excellence confused3 Still advertising as such.

What would Mark think?
----------
Richard
There may be an answer to that.......he has gone else where!
I admit I’m a little surprised that Autosleepers didn’t (apparently) help a little more, and a little quicker.  Although to be fair to all sides we don’t know what was said to them and what was said back.  But this appears to be a Peugeot error.  Autosleepers presumably purchased a van that was road legal and made to specification, and converted it.  So I presume their stance was that this isn’t a ‘fault’ that Autosleepers should accept liability for.

Perhaps they could have helped more (although we really don’t know all the facts) but I’m not sure that this issue means that they aren’t Motorhome’s of excellence anymore.  However, I admit I’m biased as I’ve always had excellent help from them and I think my van is excellent.

Sally

P.S. this is in no way a criticism of anyone, and it is not an attempt to dismiss what is very upsetting.
Sally
Sally
Member
Member

Female

Posts : 1162
Joined : 2018-02-19
Location : Yorkshire
Auto-Sleeper Model : Sussex Duo
Vehicle Year : 2011

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Bulletguy Sat Aug 03, 2019 1:55 pm

Sally wrote:
Kdc wrote:M
rgermain wrote:Auto-Sleepers Motorhomes of Excellence confused3 Still advertising as such.

What would Mark think?
----------
Richard
There may be an answer to that.......he has gone else where!
I admit I’m a little surprised that Autosleepers didn’t (apparently) help a little more, and a little quicker.  Although to be fair to all sides we don’t know what was said to them and what was said back.  But this appears to be a Peugeot error.  Autosleepers presumably purchased a van that was road legal and made to specification, and converted it.  So I presume their stance was that this isn’t a ‘fault’ that Autosleepers should accept liability for.

Perhaps they could have helped more (although we really don’t know all the facts) but I’m not sure that this issue means that they aren’t Motorhome’s of excellence anymore.  However, I admit I’m biased as I’ve always had excellent help from them and I think my van is excellent.

Sally

P.S. this is in no way a criticism of anyone, and it is not an attempt to dismiss what is very upsetting.
It's an 'error' serious enough (imo) to warrant a major damage limitation exercise.....no pun intended. 13 work days since CLS contacted AS and still nothing. If i was CEO of either company with knowledge of a customer issue, i'd pull out all the stops to avoid a scene like the infuriated Land Rover customer i posted whose patience finally ran out.
Bulletguy
Bulletguy
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 1058
Joined : 2011-05-06
Location : Cheshire/North Staffs
Auto-Sleeper Model : Vanless

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by rgermain Sat Aug 03, 2019 2:32 pm

Sally wrote:
Kdc wrote:M
rgermain wrote:Auto-Sleepers Motorhomes of Excellence confused3 Still advertising as such.

What would Mark think?
----------
Richard
There may be an answer to that.......he has gone else where!
I admit I’m a little surprised that Autosleepers didn’t (apparently) help a little more, and a little quicker.  Although to be fair to all sides we don’t know what was said to them and what was said back.  But this appears to be a Peugeot error.  Autosleepers presumably purchased a van that was road legal and made to specification, and converted it.  So I presume their stance was that this isn’t a ‘fault’ that Autosleepers should accept liability for.

Perhaps they could have helped more (although we really don’t know all the facts) but I’m not sure that this issue means that they aren’t Motorhome’s of excellence anymore.  However, I admit I’m biased as I’ve always had excellent help from them and I think my van is excellent.

Sally

P.S. this is in no way a criticism of anyone, and it is not an attempt to dismiss what is very upsetting.

Yep us also very pleased with our Warwick and have always bought new A/S PVC. Last one in 2016 maybe things are or have changed. scratch head
-----------
Richard
rgermain
rgermain
Donator
Donator

Male

Posts : 3635
Joined : 2013-11-21
Member Age : 77
Location : Havant
Auto-Sleeper Model : Warwick duo
Vehicle Year : 2015

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Sally Sat Aug 03, 2019 2:37 pm

Bulletguy wrote:
Sally wrote:
Kdc wrote:M

There may be an answer to that.......he has gone else where!
I admit I’m a little surprised that Autosleepers didn’t (apparently) help a little more, and a little quicker.  Although to be fair to all sides we don’t know what was said to them and what was said back.  But this appears to be a Peugeot error.  Autosleepers presumably purchased a van that was road legal and made to specification, and converted it.  So I presume their stance was that this isn’t a ‘fault’ that Autosleepers should accept liability for.

Perhaps they could have helped more (although we really don’t know all the facts) but I’m not sure that this issue means that they aren’t Motorhome’s of excellence anymore.  However, I admit I’m biased as I’ve always had excellent help from them and I think my van is excellent.

Sally

P.S. this is in no way a criticism of anyone, and it is not an attempt to dismiss what is very upsetting.
It's an 'error' serious enough (imo) to warrant a major damage limitation exercise.....no pun intended. 13 work days since CLS contacted AS and still nothing. If i was CEO of either company with knowledge of a customer issue, i'd pull out all the stops to avoid a scene like the infuriated Land Rover customer i posted whose patience finally ran out.
While I understand everyone’s concern, I feel we don’t actually know what has been said, and to who, at Autosleepers. Contractually, the responsibility rests with the dealer. I seriously doubt that the CEO of Autosleepers has known about this and done nothing. You say you wouldn’t, yet you’re prepared to believe that he (or she) would.

This is a sorry tale for all concerned, particularly the original poster. But I am sometimes surprised by the Autosleeper owners who seem to almost take delight in knocking them at every opportunity. Personally I still think they are Motorhome’s of excellence, and I’m not sure I’ve seen or read anything so far to change that. 

Sally
Sally
Sally
Member
Member

Female

Posts : 1162
Joined : 2018-02-19
Location : Yorkshire
Auto-Sleeper Model : Sussex Duo
Vehicle Year : 2011

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by Sally Sat Aug 03, 2019 2:41 pm

rgermain wrote:
Sally wrote:
Kdc wrote:M

There may be an answer to that.......he has gone else where!
I admit I’m a little surprised that Autosleepers didn’t (apparently) help a little more, and a little quicker.  Although to be fair to all sides we don’t know what was said to them and what was said back.  But this appears to be a Peugeot error.  Autosleepers presumably purchased a van that was road legal and made to specification, and converted it.  So I presume their stance was that this isn’t a ‘fault’ that Autosleepers should accept liability for.

Perhaps they could have helped more (although we really don’t know all the facts) but I’m not sure that this issue means that they aren’t Motorhome’s of excellence anymore.  However, I admit I’m biased as I’ve always had excellent help from them and I think my van is excellent.

Sally

P.S. this is in no way a criticism of anyone, and it is not an attempt to dismiss what is very upsetting.

Yep us also very pleased with our Warwick and have always bought new A/S PVC. Last one in 2016 maybe things are or have changed. scratch head
-----------
Richard
Hi Richard - I really haven’t seen, read or heard anything on here to change that opinion. I’m not saying they are without criticism, but to start condemning them as a brand......no way!  But perhaps it’s just me.  hairdryer
Sally
Sally
Member
Member

Female

Posts : 1162
Joined : 2018-02-19
Location : Yorkshire
Auto-Sleeper Model : Sussex Duo
Vehicle Year : 2011

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by C.L.S Tue Sep 03, 2019 6:50 pm

Just to update my post. So decided the panel van wasn't for us and have done a deal with Nick Whale on a coachbuilt motorhome. Unfortunately never persued a resolution to the door hinge issue.
C.L.S
C.L.S
Member
Member

Male

Posts : 40
Joined : 2019-06-30
Location : Midlands
Auto-Sleeper Model : Warwick xl
Vehicle Year : 2019

Back to top Go down

Rear door restrictors  - Page 3 Empty Re: Rear door restrictors

Post by RogerThat Tue Sep 03, 2019 9:30 pm

Bought my van from Nick Whale too!
RogerThat
RogerThat
Donator
Donator

Male

Posts : 1192
Joined : 2018-01-25
Location : North West
Auto-Sleeper Model : Stanway
Vehicle Year : 2018

Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 5 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum